<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pothead Philosopher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The ramblings of a pothead philosopher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Saving Time and Frustration &#8211; Assessing the Worthiness of Debating by Julian Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/saving-time-and-frustration-assessing-the-worthiness-of-debating/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Great one.
Just remember to ask also at the beginning: &quot;Is there any possibility that I can change your mind, using my reasoning, evidence or proof?&quot;. If they say &quot;No, I&#039;ll always believe in god no matter what&quot;, then why bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great one.<br />
Just remember to ask also at the beginning: &#8220;Is there any possibility that I can change your mind, using my reasoning, evidence or proof?&#8221;. If they say &#8220;No, I&#8217;ll always believe in god no matter what&#8221;, then why bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Saving Time and Frustration &#8211; Assessing the Worthiness of Debating by trendyhipster</title>
		<link>http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/saving-time-and-frustration-assessing-the-worthiness-of-debating/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>trendyhipster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 05:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-403</guid>
		<description>You can use it in the middle of any arguments you&#039;re having right now, as well. It&#039;s quite versatile. Just play dumb whenever someone mentions something that you don&#039;t understand (faith) and go from there. Thanks for the feedback guys, I hope I&#039;ve removed a lot of frustration from your futures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can use it in the middle of any arguments you&#8217;re having right now, as well. It&#8217;s quite versatile. Just play dumb whenever someone mentions something that you don&#8217;t understand (faith) and go from there. Thanks for the feedback guys, I hope I&#8217;ve removed a lot of frustration from your futures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Saving Time and Frustration &#8211; Assessing the Worthiness of Debating by ozatheist</title>
		<link>http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/saving-time-and-frustration-assessing-the-worthiness-of-debating/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>ozatheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 04:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-402</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;“Will you be putting forth, as a statement of truth, that faith is greater than reason?”&lt;/em&gt;

That is a good opening question. Like Chappy, I may have to start using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“Will you be putting forth, as a statement of truth, that faith is greater than reason?”</em></p>
<p>That is a good opening question. Like Chappy, I may have to start using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Saving Time and Frustration &#8211; Assessing the Worthiness of Debating by the chaplain</title>
		<link>http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/saving-time-and-frustration-assessing-the-worthiness-of-debating/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>the chaplain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 22:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Great advice. I&#039;ll have to start applying it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice. I&#8217;ll have to start applying it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is objective morality even possible if it is God&#8217;s will? by trendyhipster</title>
		<link>http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/is-objective-morality-even-possible-if-it-is-gods-will/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>trendyhipster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-399</guid>
		<description>&quot;Morality is not subjective if you know all that can be known&quot;. This suggests that there is something outside of God to know.

It boils down to this: Did God create the rules of morality, or did God look to something outside of preference for morality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Morality is not subjective if you know all that can be known&#8221;. This suggests that there is something outside of God to know.</p>
<p>It boils down to this: Did God create the rules of morality, or did God look to something outside of preference for morality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is objective morality even possible if it is God&#8217;s will? by Russ</title>
		<link>http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/is-objective-morality-even-possible-if-it-is-gods-will/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trendyhipster.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Morality is not subjective if you know all that can be known.  If you are limited in knowledge and not influenced by others then your morality is subjective.  God knows all things.

…who has known the mind of the LORD? Or who has become His counselor?  Or who has first given to Him And it shall be repaid to him?

Children are always subject to their parents even if the parents are evil, however, that does not mean that you are always correct in what you require of your children because you are not all knowing.  

Perhaps I am not able to fully follow your thought and I may not be addressing your point at all.  For this I apologize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morality is not subjective if you know all that can be known.  If you are limited in knowledge and not influenced by others then your morality is subjective.  God knows all things.</p>
<p>…who has known the mind of the LORD? Or who has become His counselor?  Or who has first given to Him And it shall be repaid to him?</p>
<p>Children are always subject to their parents even if the parents are evil, however, that does not mean that you are always correct in what you require of your children because you are not all knowing.  </p>
<p>Perhaps I am not able to fully follow your thought and I may not be addressing your point at all.  For this I apologize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
